Which fallacy involves assuming a causal connection between two unrelated events?

Prepare for the Civil Air Patrol Staff Sergeant Leadership Test. Use multiple-choice questions with explanations and hints. Ace your exam now!

The Post Hoc Fallacy, also known as post hoc, ergo propter hoc, is a logical error in reasoning that implies a cause-and-effect relationship between two events simply because one event follows another in time. This fallacy occurs when someone concludes that because one event occurred after another, the first event caused the second event, without any credible evidence to support that claim.

For example, if someone argues that because a rooster crows before the sun rises, the crowing of the rooster causes the sun to rise, they are committing the Post Hoc Fallacy. The timing of the two events is relevant, but the link between them is purely coincidental.

In contrast, the other options relate to different reasoning errors. Circular Reasoning involves an argument where the conclusion is included in the premise, giving no actual proof to support the argument. Weak Analogy makes a comparison between two things that are not sufficiently similar to draw a conclusion, while False Dilemma presents only two choices when, in fact, more options may exist. Understanding these distinctions helps clarify why the Post Hoc Fallacy specifically pertains to misattributed causation based on timing.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy